fbpx Skip to main content
search
Category

Clinical Study Diaton tonometer

Aug 13 2026
Love0
Clinical comparative tonometry study — Goldmann Applanation (GAT) vs. Pascal Dynamic Contour (DCT) vs. Diaton Transpalpebral (DT) Zárate, Jiménez-Román, Gil-Carrasco — Asociación Para Evitar la Ceguera en México (APEC) / UNAM 📊 77 eyes, 40 patients with glaucoma or glaucoma suspicion Mean IOP: GAT: 14.4 mmHg DCT: 18.8 mmHg Diaton: 15.1 mmHg Agreement with Goldmann: Diaton: 0.69 mmHg average difference DCT: 4.45 mmHg average difference Diaton tracked closely with the clinical reference standard in this study — even more closely than a device specifically engineered for corneal independence. A meaningful data point supporting corneal-independent tonometry as a reliable option in real glaucoma patients. Learn more: www.diaton.com

Clinical comparative tonometry study — Goldmann Applanation (GAT) vs. Diaton Transpalpebral (DT) vs. Pascal Dynamic Contour (DCT) Tonometers

By Clinical Study Diaton tonometer, clinical trial tonometer, Goldmann vs Diaton tonometer, News
Clinical comparative tonometry study — Goldmann Applanation (GAT) vs. Pascal Dynamic Contour (DCT) vs. Diaton Transpalpebral (DT) Zárate, Jiménez-Román, Gil-Carrasco — Asociación Para Evitar la Ceguera en México (APEC) /…
Read More